Nettsider med emneord «policy knowledge»

How do policy makers and experts draw on regional and/or international knowledge when they formulate policies for national school reforms? What counts for them as evidence and expertise? Research findings and questions were discussed in a double symposium organized by the POLNET project at the Annual Conference for the Comparative & International Education Society in San Francisco.

The POLNET project organized a workshop to explore how bibliometric data and findings can be compared accross the Nordic countries.

POLNET will have a paper session entitled "Tracing the Formation and Utilization of Evidence in Nordic Education Policy" at the annual meeting for the Comparative & International Education Society. Our session is selected as the highlighted session for the Globalization & Education SIG.

Ninni Wahlström and Andreas Nordin examine the transfer and translation of policy ideas and knowledge by analyzing the bibliographic references in the policy documents from OECD and Swedish School Commission.

This brief summarizes the key findings and implications of the first part of the POLNET project, focusing on the Norwegian context.

POLNET will hold a symposium entitled “Translating Education Policy Knowledge: A Comparison within and across the Nordic Region” at the annual meeting for the Nordic Educational Research Association.

POLNET organized a symposium entitled “Approaches to historical research on education reforms, policy, and politics in the Nordic context and beyond” at the annual meeting for the Nordic Educational Research Association.

After two days of intense discussions and planning of future publications, the research group organised a double symposium at the Annual meeting of the Nordic Educational Research Association (NERA).

POLNET team will hold a symposium entitled “Did the Nordic Model Survive? A comparative-historical analysis of school reform policy” at the NordEd conference on April 22, 2021.

In this book, POLNET researchers shows how governments cope with the pressure to use data and evidence for their policy decisions.