-
Bjørnestad, Elisabeth & Hatlevik, Ove Edvard
(2023).
Barnehage og skole hånd i hånd?
Har barnehagen betydning for barns senere skoleprestasjoner?
-
-
Hatlevik, Ove Edvard; Øgrim, Leikny & Johannesen, Monica
(2023).
Studenters oppfatning av profesjonsfaglig digital kompetanse.
In Johannesen, Monica; Lundberg, Pål & Smestad, Bjørn (Ed.),
Utdanning for tverrfaglige mål.
Fagbokforlaget.
ISSN 9788245047806.
p. 177–188.
Show summary
Tverrfaglighet har vært tema i skole og lærerutdanning lenge, og LK20 understreker viktigheten av å jobbe på tvers av fagdisipliner, blant annet gjennom de tverrfaglige temaene. I lærerutdanningen jobbes det med fagovergripende temaer, blant annet digital kompetanse, forsknings-og utviklingskompetanse og mangfoldskompetanse. Det er disse tre fagovergripende kompetansene denne boka har som omdreiningspunkt.
Ved å lese denne boka får du som lærerstudent og lærer inngående kjennskap til hva fagovergripende kompetanse for lærere er. Vi retter oppmerksomheten mot tverrfaglighet og fagovergripende mål i grunnskole og lærerutdanning – og hvilken kompetanse lærere trenger for å ivareta disse. Boka presenterer fagovergripende lærerkompetanser fra en rekke synsvinkler, med kapitler både fra læreres praksis i klasserommet og forskeres funn etter intervjuer og observasjoner. På denne måten framkommer et mangefasettert bilde. Gjennom kapitlene i denne boka kan alle som jobber med skole og lærerutdanning, få nye perspektiver på lærerens kompetanse, og også bedre forståelse av de mange perspektivene som finnes.
-
Gisholt, Per Jacob; Hvistendal, Heidi; Øgrim, Leikny; Hatlevik, Ove Edvard & Johannesen, Monica
(2023).
Det teknologirike klasserommet - arbeidsformer og verktøy.
In Johannesen, Monica; Lundberg, Pål & Smestad, Bjørn (Ed.),
Utdanning for tverrfaglige mål.
Fagbokforlaget.
ISSN 9788245047806.
p. 31–44.
Show summary
Tverrfaglighet har vært tema i skole og lærerutdanning lenge, og LK20 understreker viktigheten av å jobbe på tvers av fagdisipliner, blant annet gjennom de tverrfaglige temaene. I lærerutdanningen jobbes det med fagovergripende temaer, blant annet digital kompetanse, forsknings-og utviklingskompetanse og mangfoldskompetanse. Det er disse tre fagovergripende kompetansene denne boka har som omdreiningspunkt.
Ved å lese denne boka får du som lærerstudent og lærer inngående kjennskap til hva fagovergripende kompetanse for lærere er. Vi retter oppmerksomheten mot tverrfaglighet og fagovergripende mål i grunnskole og lærerutdanning – og hvilken kompetanse lærere trenger for å ivareta disse. Boka presenterer fagovergripende lærerkompetanser fra en rekke synsvinkler, med kapitler både fra læreres praksis i klasserommet og forskeres funn etter intervjuer og observasjoner. På denne måten framkommer et mangefasettert bilde. Gjennom kapitlene i denne boka kan alle som jobber med skole og lærerutdanning, få nye perspektiver på lærerens kompetanse, og også bedre forståelse av de mange perspektivene som finnes.
-
Smestad, Bjørn; Hatlevik, Ove Edvard; Johannesen, Monica & Øgrim, Leikny
(2023).
Identifying characteristics of TPDC – a literature review.
Show summary
Research topic/aim
The digitisation of education has heightened the importance of examining which competences are needed amongst teachers and student teachers. This study addresses how the literature characterises the dimensions of teachers’ digital competences both before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. We ask how does the literature characterise the dimensions of teachers’ digital competence and to what extent does this characterisation also apply to the literature on teachers’ digital competence in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic?
Theoretical framework
The concept of digital teaching is transdisciplinary, often described as consisting of pedagogical and methodological knowledge, content knowledge on school subjects, and transdisciplinary knowledge in several areas (Mishra & Koehler, 2006, Redecker (2017). Smestad and Gillespie (2020) investigated the understanding of teachers‘ competences in three such transdisciplinary areas, namely, teachers’ digital competence and competences on diversity and research and development. The study presented here builds on the review described in Smestad and Gillespie (2020) and further explores one of the transdisciplinary competences: teachers’ professional digital competence.
Methodology/research design
This study builds on the systematic review from Smestad and Gillespie, which was a concept synthesis (see Tricco et al., 2016) that identified six key dimensions within which there were tensions in the literature reviewed. In this study, we build on the part of the systematic review that discusses teachers’ digital competence and supplement the articles with newer ones related to teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Expected results/findings
The results indicate that the articles on teachers’ digital competence tend to have the following characteristics: lack clarity when it comes to beneficiaries of digital competence; position the teacher more as a functionary than as a designer; are concerned with teachers’ attitudes, knowledge and skills; and view competence as being based on experience and theory, often not connected to subjects and often based on self-reported data. These characteristics of numerous studies on teachers’ digital competence open opportunities for further discussion.
-
Gudmundsdottir, Greta Björk & Hatlevik, Ove Edvard
(2022).
Professional digital competence in Norwegian teacher education .
-
Øgrim, Leikny; Johannesen, Monica & Hatlevik, Ove Edvard
(2022).
Teachers´ professional digital competence, between policy, theory and practice.
Show summary
Public debates about the role of digital technology in schools and education are partly dominated by digital advocates asking for more computers in school and more digital pedagogy, and partly by sceptics warning against what they describe as a huge experiment. The debates have been seen both in the public and in the research community and influence political documents like white papers, frameworks and curricula. As a response to this, the framework for teacher professional digital competence (tDIGc) was developed in Norway (Kelenctric et al, 2017).
Smestad & Gillespie (2020) present an overview of international research discussing transdisciplinary competencies, including tDIGc, showing that discussions of tDIGc usually emphasize practical user skills and integration of digital tools in teaching, and less theoretical knowledge of the field.
The aim of the paper is to investigate the relation between political, theoretical, and practical aspects of digital technology in Norwegian schools and teacher education. Political aspects are materialized in white papers, frameworks, and curricula. Knowledge on theoretical perspectives may be knowledge on the role of technology in school and society and the digital influence on pedagogy and teaching methods. Practical aspects are how tDIGc is put into practice in schools and teacher education.
Theoretical framework
The concepts of coherence in teacher education (Hammerness, 2010) form the theoretical framework of this presentation and is extended to include coherence of visions, ideas, and goals, on and across the political, practical, and theoretical aspects of digital technology in schools and education.
Methodology
Data from two surveys on student teachers understanding of digital technology in schools form the basis for focus interviews with 10 groups of student teachers in 8 placement schools. In addition, 6 practice teachers and 3 teacher educators are interviewed to capture tensions between the three aspects of digital technology in schools and teacher education.
Expected findings
The theoretical understanding of the role of technology, seems to be absent among student teachers and teachers. This can be explained by digital competence not being a school subject, implicit stating that teachers know how to teach and discuss the field of digital technologies, based on their practical skills, rather than a broader and more scientific-based knowledge of the role of technologies in education. This is paradoxically illustrated after the introduction of the newest national curriculum, where all teachers are assumed to teach algorithmic thinking, usually understood as programming.
Relevance to Nordic educational research
The study is based on a case from Norway. However, we believe the findings are relevant for teacher education in the Nordic countries.
References
Hammerness, K.M. (2013). Examining features of teacher education in Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 57(4), 400–419
Kelentrić, M., Helland, K. & Arstorp, A.T. (2017). Professional Digital Competence Framework for Teachers in Norway. The Norwegian Centre for ICT in Education
Smestad, B., & Gillespie, A. (2020). Dimensions of teachers’ transdisciplinary competence based on a systematic review of three transdisciplinary areas. NJCIE, 4(3-4), 56–71.
-
Johannesen, Monica; Øgrim, Leikny & Hatlevik, Ove Edvard
(2021).
The role of materiality in the conceptual understanding of professional knowledge.
-
Bjørnestad, Elisabeth; Hatlevik, Ove Edvard; Sandvik, Margareth; Hegna, Maren Meyer & Trouiller, Thomas finnøy
(2021).
Informasjonswebinar - GoBaN studien.
-
Øgrim, Leikny & Hatlevik, Ove Edvard
(2021).
PfDK og klasseledelse - er TPACK og DeCompEdu svaret?
-
Øgrim, Leikny; Johannesen, Monica & Hatlevik, Ove Edvard
(2021).
The Role of the University and the Placement Schools in the Development of Student Teachers' Professional Digital Competence.
Show summary
In initial teacher education, the student teachers encounter different learning arenas, whereas the two formal ones are university campus and workplace (i.e. placement schools). Studies on the relation between learning in campus and placement schools, often describe students as receptive and passive in the campus-based learning context, as opposed to be more active and involved in the placement schools (Finne, Mordal & Stene, 2014).
Although university campuses and workplaces are different contexts, students do not necessarily see this difference as a "gap" (Lohmander, 2015). Instead, they might see campus and placement schools as involving different modes of knowledge (Christensen, Eritsland & Havnes, 2014). Learning on campus is characterized by theoretical knowledge and requires analytical and critical reflection. On the other hand, workplace learning, for example carried out in placement schools, is characterized by practical knowledge which can be developed and implemented by the learner at the workplace (Gee, 2000). Raaen & Thorsen (2020) question the idea of a gap between theory and practice and advocate a form of coherence which requires cultural exchange between the learning arenas. This tension of understanding the different roles of learning, is to our knowledge, not discussed with regard to teacher students’ professional digital competence.
There is little research on the role of practice placement in developing student teachers´ professional digital competence. An exception is Galanouli & McNair (2001) who conclude their research that schools must be supported and resourced properly and that placement teachers must be trained in the use of technology, for student teachers to improve their professional digital competence during practice placement. The same authors state that higher education institutions emphasize the development of the student teachers’ ability to reflect on the pedagogical use of technology in their teaching practice.
For more than two decades, Norwegian teacher education institutions have integrated professional digital competence training into subject areas (Engen, Giæver& Mifsud, 2015; Johannesen & Øgrim 2020). In evaluations from training in university campuses and placements schools both, teacher educators and student teachers report that they do not have sufficient professional digital competence (Engen et al., 2009; Gudmundsdottir & Hatlevik, 2018).
In this paper, we investigate the roles of learning arenas for the development of student teachers’ professional digital competence. As part of the picture, the concept of professional digital competence is used for analyzing the role of the learning arenas
-
Hatlevik, Ove Edvard; Johannesen, Monica & Øgrim, Leikny
(2020).
Student teachers’ perspectives on teachers’ professional digital competence, ethical issues and their ICT self-efficacy.
-
Johannesen, Monica; Øgrim, Leikny & Hatlevik, Ove Edvard
(2020).
Teachers´ professional digital competence – management of technology-rich classrooms.
-
Mifsud, Louise; Hatlevik, Ove Edvard; Giæver, Tonje Hilde & Engen, Bård Ketil
(2019).
The Cyber Ethics Divide: Addressing Cyber Ethics in Initial Teacher Education.
-
Johannesen, Monica; Øgrim, Leikny & Hatlevik, Ove Edvard
(2019).
Perspectives on teachers´ professional digital competence.
-
Engen, Bård Ketil; Hatlevik, Ove Edvard; Giæver, Tonje Hilde & Mifsud, Louise
(2018).
Student teachers’ attitude towards ICT: An analysis of perceived usefulness.
-
Gudmundsdottir, Greta Björk & Hatlevik, Ove Edvard
(2018).
Conference paper: Student teachers, ICT and cyber ethics across four European countries.
-
Hatlevik, Ida Katrine R & Hatlevik, Ove Edvard
(2017).
Antecedents of teachers’ self-efficacy for using ICT in their teaching practice
.
-
Hatlevik, Ove Edvard & Throndsen, Inger
(2016).
Digital responsibility - a required literacy for citizenship: How to understand and measure the concept?
-
Flo, Jill; Landmark, Bjørg; Hatlevik, Ove Edvard; Tønnessen, Siri & Fagerström, Lisbeth
(2016).
Pleieintensitet i hjemmesykepleien –det modifiserte OPCqinstrumentets validitet og reliabilitet.
-
Hatlevik, Ove Edvard; Loi, Massimo; Gudmundsdottir, Greta Björk & Throndsen, Inger
(2015).
Computer and information literacy and self-efficacy: The cases of Denmark, Norway and Poland.
-
Engen, Bård Ketil; Giæver, Tonje Hilde; Gudmundsdottir, Greta Björk; Hatlevik, Ove Edvard; Mifsud, Louise & Tømte, Karoline
(2015).
Conference paper: Student teachers’ attitudes towards ICT use in teaching and learning.
-
Engen, Bård Ketil; Giæver, Tonje Hilde; Gudmundsdottir, Greta Björk; Hatlevik, Ove Edvard; Mifsud, Louise & Tømte, Karoline
(2014).
Pre-Service Student Teachers’ Awareness of their Digital Responsibility.
-
Hatlevik, Ove Edvard; Throndsen, Inger & Ottestad, Geir
(2012).
Goal orientation, family background and school leadership predicting students' digital literacy.
-
Tømte, Cathrine Edelhard & Hatlevik, Ove Edvard
(2011).
Selvtillit, IKT og kjønn.
-
Hatlevik, Ove Edvard; Pettersen, Geir Olaf & Berg, Monica
(2011).
På hvilken måte påvirker programdesignet matematikkundervisningen?
-
-
-
-
-
Bjarnø, Vibeke; Hatlevik, Ove Edvard & Standal, Øyvind Førland
(2018).
ILD - Integrerte læringsarenaer gjennom digitalisering.
7Letras.
Show summary
I forbindelse med prosjektet ILD - Integrerte læringsarenaer gjennom digitalisering ble det etablert en følgegruppe for å dokumentere prosess og resultater. Følgegruppa har bestått av tre personer; førstelektor og studieleder Vibeke Bjarnø og professorene Ove Edvard Hatlevik og Øyvind Førland Standal. Følgegruppa har vært ledet av Vibeke Bjarnø.
I tillegg til følgegruppa har ILD bestått av to delprosjekter leda av henholdsvis dosent Bjørn Smestad og førsteamanuensis Bård Ketil Engen.
ILD-rapporten er skrevet av følgegruppa med tekstbidrag fra de to delprosjektlederne. Enkelte av de involverte lærerutdannerne i første studieår på den 5-årige grunnskolelærerutdanninga for 1.-7. trinn har også bidratt med korte eller lengre tekstelementer som har utgjort deler av grunnlaget følgegruppa har brukt for å skrive rapporten. Dette gjelder universitetslektorene Trine Gedde Dahl, Siri Krogh Nordby, Trude Sundtjønn og Mikkel Bertram Rustad, samt førsteamanuensis Olav Gravir Imenes.
-
Ottestad, Geir; Throndsen, Inger; Hatlevik, Ove Edvard & Rohatgi, Anubha
(2014).
Digitale ferdigheter for alle? Norske resultater fra ICILS 2013.
Senter for IKT i utdanningen/Institutt for lærerutdanning og skoleforskning.
ISSN 978-82-93378-09-9.
-
Hatlevik, Ove Edvard; Egeberg, Gunstein; Gudmundsdottir, Greta Björk; Loftsgarden, Marit & Loi, Massimo
(2013).
Monitor skole 2013. Om digital kompetanse og erfaringer med bruk av IKT i skolen.
Senter for IKT i utdanningen.
ISSN 9788299869867.
-
Egeberg, Gunstein; Gudmundsdottir, Greta Björk; Hatlevik, Ove Edvard; Ottestad, Geir; Skaug, Jørund Høie & Tømte, Karoline
(2012).
Monitor 2011. Skolens digitale tilstand.
Senter for IKT i utdanningen.
ISSN 9788299869812.
-
Dalaaker, Dina; Egeberg, Gunstein; Gudmundsdottir, Greta Björk; Guttormsgaard, Vibeke; Hatlevik, Ove Edvard & Ottestad, Geir
[Show all 7 contributors for this article]
(2012).
Monitor 2012. Elever skal synes. Hvordan kan IKT utvikle kompetansen i skolen?
Senter for IKT i utdanningen.
ISSN 9788299869843.